From YouTube to blip.tv
Related entries in Blog software & toolsAfter the whole YouTube fiasco we have now switched to blip.tv for our own personal videos.
We’ve been using blip for our last couple of videos. I find the service fairly easy to use. In comparison, the files seem to load as fast as with YouTube and the quality of the compression seems a fair bit higher. However, the conversion into flash is slower and the ease of embedding is not as user friendly - I love that on YouTube the embed code is right there. With blip, you have to click a couple of times to get there.
As far as the embed video player is concerned, they seem equally good. The YouTube one "feels" more web 2.0 - it’s all curvy and whatnot. But the blip one is much more seamless and unobtrusive. Just a preference choice there.
I will continue to use YouTube from a consumer perspective - I search and embed them all the time. But from a copyright perspective, we are moving our own personal content to an area that allows us to assign the license per video. I am sure there will be many more video services to come, but I am pleased so far with blip.
What other video services have you used?







August 28th, 2006 at 7:20 pm
I like blip.tv too. And the embedded feature is better in my opinion.
October 12th, 2006 at 5:08 pm
I love youtube, but for my personal videos I have been using a new service called Fliqz (www.fliqz.com) - i prefer them to blip.tv